Is blood transfusion permissible in Jewish belief?

I am a blood donor since 1966 and I am trying to stay on schedule for every 56 days as it is permissible. I also received blood transfusions during critical situations.
My blood type O+, is one of the most desirable. The blood donation is not just a physical act, it is an act of saving of somebody life.
It is an ultimate Mitzvah i am able to perform. Reply

can i donate blood on a sabbath/? as it saves lives Reply

Dear Elizabeth, The command to 'abstain from blood' covers the eating of blood. There were no refrigerators In the camp while crossing the desert, and blood would have putrefied very quickly. Eating it would have been a very risky business. From my reading of the Mosaic Law, there are three different reasons behind some of G-d's instructions. They are, physical health, spiritual health and obedience. Sometimes, looking from our modern perspective, it is not easy to know which we are looking at, and we have to try and put ourselves in the position of the people the law was first given to, without any presuppositions. Reply

What does the command to abstain from blood entail? Reply

If life is in the blood , don’t they acquire different characteristics from that new life which will be like 2 different souls? Reply

Can Jews donate blood during Passover? Reply

What about donating blood plasma and being paid for it? Reply

After re-reading Rochel Chein's comment above, could I encourage you to give blood for the bloodbank? Whatever society you are in, there are people who require an infusion. If you feel uncomfortable simply placing you blood in the common pool, ask at your collection centre if they will accept your contribution on a Jewish preferential basis.
I was a blood donor for 52 years and thank G-d that, over that time, He gave me the health and strength to supply enough blood to fill 14 people. Reply

Rochel Chein, Re the statement, 'overriding nearly all of the others. (The exceptions are murder,
There is a situation which has raised much debate, that is the position where saving a person's life can only be accomplished by taking the life of their assailant.

That happened in the town where I was living. From the legal standpoint, the man who killed the assailant to protect a family was (quite rightly) taken to court and the judge dismissed the case without a conviction.

To the best of my knowledge the moral standpoint is still unresolved. Reply

Ooops I was almost killed by a typo. I needed a transfusion after surgery and they were taking an unnecessary amount of time and effort explaining why I needed it. It wasn't til later that I found that my religious preference had been entered as JW instead of JE.

If I recall correctly, a Jew can accept a porcine heart valve if it is needed to save his or her life. It's not the same as eating a bacon cheeseburger. Reply

Blood transfuson Janice, Tennessee. I agree with your comment entirely.
See my comment of 10 December. Would not withholding a life-saving transfusion (refusing to save a life) equate to murder? If so, would not those who claim that they withhold transfusion on scriptural grounds be claiming that G-d was an instigator of murder? I find it hard to find any alternative, and would like to hear clarification from those who refuse transfusions.
RM. To increase the patient's red blood cell production with Epo, or anything else, they have to be kept alive until it has time to work .
For the information of anyone facing surgery and being able to follow this path; I had an artificial hip implanted, and before the operation I gave two units of blood for an 'autologous' transfusion. If I required blood I would get my own back. If I did not require it, it would go into the blood bank for someone who did need it.
I was a blood donor for 52 years, and praise G-d that I never needed to receive any Reply

blood transfusions It;s a huge jump using a dietary law restricting eating the blood of an animal for restricting blood transfusions. The two aren't even comparable and its misapplication of torah Reply

Re the above comment that murder is forbidden, even to save life. This is a more complex issue than that comment would indicate. Firstly, are 'murder' and 'killing' synonymous? Some argue that 'murder' is for personal reasons and 'killing' is for duty or humanitarian reasons. Having the ability to save life and not doing so, is the same as taking life. Seeing a person in the act of taking the life of another, having the ability to prevent that murder (even perhaps multiple murders) but only by killing the perpetrator, is not a hypothetical situation. It is an issue Police Officers and Armed Forces personnel face in the line of their duty. Having to make such a decision is unlikely for most individuals, it was forced on the passengers and crew of flight 93 on 9/11. This is a fraught question, a deeply personal one, and one which we will need to justify before G-d, but the principle is better decided after careful thought rather than in the heat and uncertainty of a stressed situation. Reply

Blood Transfusions should be against the Torah The Torah commands "You must not eat nothing containing blood." Leviticus 19:26. Isn't receiving a blood transfusion just as bad as eating blood? The Torah also commands "You should pour [the blood] out on the ground like water." Deuteronomy 12:16. Receiving a blood transfusion would be in violation of the scripture at Deuteronomy 12:16 which states that the blood (the source of life) should be poured into the ground like water. In addition, there are blood alternatives that can be used such as erythropoietin. Erythropietin or Epo can be used make the bone marrow produce more red blood cells. In addition, blood transfusions are not necessarily safe. In Sherwood v. Danbury Hosp., 896 A.2d 777 (Conn., 2006) a patient filed suit against a hospital claiming that she contracted HIV from from a blood transfusion given prior to surgery. The court sided with the hospital stating that the plaintiff's complaint was time barred due to the statute of limitations. Reply

Dear Mrs. Chein,

Your fine answer does not go far enough in support of Jews (and others) donating blood. Yes, saving a life trumps all but three mitzvot. While donating blood is permitted, saving lives is required. If your spouse, parent, child or rebbe needed blood, you would rush to give, provided it did not endanger your own health. Every day someone's beloved needs blood. The fact that we do not know their name is no excuse under Jewish law. (In the 8 levels of tsedakah from Maimonides, giving when donor and recipient are anonymous to each other ranks #2 from the top. Because of medical confidentiality, this is always the case with blood.)

Thus, because the need is always here and it is safe for the donor, Jews must search out this simple way to save lives. Giving a pint of blood takes about one hour from walking in to walking out. Reply

Shirin Bar-Sela's comment Dear Mohammad Khan, You obviously misunderstood my comment. In no way have I ever promoted the eating of pork. I used that example, as have many Muslim and Jewish scholars, only to show that even the most important of laws can be broken to preserve a life. Taking my comment out of context is nothing more than flaming, and there was no reason other than that to feign disgust at my comment. I know nothing of witches' remedies, but I do know of health laws; my father was a scholar of both Islam and Judaism, and translated the Asaf and Rambam into English. All I said - and you repeated it - is that is it permissible to eat pork to save a life. Reply

Shirin Bar Sela's comment As a Muslim I found Shirin Bar Sela 's comment horrible and violation of G-d's law. There is no medical research indicating that a patient would get healed by eating pork. That would have to be remedy from witches of thousand years ago.
However under Islam pork and meat of other animals is only allowed during the outbreak of famine and war when only no other food is available. You only eat as much to sustain your life in that circumstance and not for enjoyment. Reply

As a former Jehovah's Witness that watched her mom die from not having a blood transfusion, even though the doctor said she has a good chance of dying if she did not receive one was upsetting to me. It is not up to your conscious, if you take one you would be disfellowshipped (shunned by friends and family in the religion). They never told the members of her congregation why she really died even though it is on her death certificate, they did not acknowledge it. Reply

blood of my blood In England Witnesses go door to door in an attempt to convert people. Sadly this is more often than not greeted with scorn and foul derision. I, on the other hand, as a practising agnostic, invite them in and try to convert them.

Mudz, kudos to you. Porphyria - what a genius question!

Anonymous, what happened to you in those three weeks that caused you to u-turn so vehemently? It should also be noted that medicine evolved as it did because of the certain knowledge that blood is even more essential to life than water. We all know that we've only got a few days without taking in fluids but I challenge anyone to survive for just one second without blood. Why do you think keyhole surgery even exists? It will always be chosen before slicing someone open.

If god really exists then surely he would want us to use our brains for our own benefit. Reply

Mitzvoh This was quite enlightening. I am curious though, if blood transfusions were also considered as part of the prohibition and therefore disrespectful to G-d, would the commandment to preserve life override this?
Or another way to put it. If literally eating blood became a medically beneficial procedure that could save lives, which takes precedence?
Reply